Evaluation of Apparent Nutrient Digestibility of Diets UsingFish Meal and Catfish By- Product Meal for Guinea Fowls

Date Received: 15-03-2016

Date Accepted: 17-08-2016

##submissions.doi##:

Views

1

Downloads

1

Section:

CHĂN NUÔI – THÚ Y – THỦY SẢN

How to Cite:

Dong Hai , N., & Dong, N. (2024). Evaluation of Apparent Nutrient Digestibility of Diets UsingFish Meal and Catfish By- Product Meal for Guinea Fowls. Vietnam Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 14(8), 1177–1184. https://vie.vjas.vn/index.php/vjasvn/article/view/1430

Evaluation of Apparent Nutrient Digestibility of Diets UsingFish Meal and Catfish By- Product Meal for Guinea Fowls

Nguyen Dong Hai 1 , Nguyen Thi Kim Dong 2

  • 1 Khoa Kỹ thuật - Công nghệ, Trường Cao đẳng Cộng đồng Kiên Giang
  • 2 KhoaNông nghiệp và SHUD, Trường Đại học Cần Thơ
  • Keywords

    Guinea fowl, nutrient digestibility, catfish by- product meal, fish meal

    Abstract


    The experiment was carried out to evaluate the apparent nutrient digestibility of Guinea fowls at 8 and 10 weeks of age fed diets containing twodifferent protein feed sources and fourcrude protein (CP) levels. The trial used a completely randomized design with two factors and 3 replications. The first factor was two protein feed sources including fish meal and catfish by- product meal and the second factorcomposed offour dietary crude protein (CP) levels of 16, 18, 20 and 22%. The results showed that the apparent EE, NDF and ADF digestibilities of the diet with fish meal were higher than those of catfish by- product meal diet (P< 0.05). The diets contained 20% CP and 18% CP fed Guinea fowls at 8 and 10 weeks of age had the higher DM, OM, EE, CF, NDF, ADF digestibility coefficients and better N retention (P< 0,05).

    References

    Agbolosu, A. A., Teye M. and Adam R. I. (2014). Effects of replacing maize with graded levels of Boiled Mango Kernel Meal on the Carcass and Sensory characteristics of indigenous Guinea fowl (Numida Meleagris) meat. Global Journal of Animal Scientific Research, 2(4): 345 - 350.

    Almirall, M., Francesch M., Perez - Vendrell A. M., Brufau J. and Esteve G. E. (1995). The differences in intestinal viscosity produced by barley and beta - glucanase alter digesta enzyme activities and ileal nutrient digestibilities more in broiler chicks than in cocks. The Journal of Nutrition, 125: 947 - 955.

    AOAC (1990). Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 15th edition. Volume One. Arlington, Virginia, USA, pp. 69 - 90.

    Đặng Hùng Cường (2010). Ảnh hưởng của các mức độ protein thô trong khẩu phần lên khả năng tăng trọng và tỷ lệ tiêu hóa dưỡng chất của gà Sao. Luận văn tốt nghiệp thạc sĩ khoa học nông nghiệp, chuyên ngành Chăn nuôi, Trường Đại học Cần Thơ, tr. 35 - 59.

    Grimaud Farms (2016). Guinea Fowl - The tasty alternative to chicken, http://www.grimaudfarms .com/fowl.htm. Cited 26/01/2016.

    NRC (1994). Nutrient requirement of poultry. Ninth revised edition. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp. 113 - 114.

    Karn, J. F. (1991). Chemical composition of forage and feces as affected by microwave oven drying. Journal of Range Management, 44: 512 - 515.

    Nguyen Thi Kim Dong (2005). Evaluation of Agro - Industial By - Products as Protein Sources for Duck Production in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam, Doctoral Thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, pp. 836 - 837.

    Nguyễn Thị Thùy Linh (2012). Nghiên cứu nâng cao lượng rau muống (Ipomoea aquatica) trong khẩu phần của gà Sao dòng trung nuôi thịt, Luận văn Thạc sĩ Khoa học Nông nghiệp, chuyên ngành Chăn nuôi, Trường Đại học Cần Thơ, tr. 49 - 62.

    Tôn Thất Thịnh (2010). Ảnh hưởng của các mức độ bổ sung lục bình tươi lên khả năng tăng trưởng, tỷ lệ tiêu hóa dưỡng chất và hiệu quả kinh tế của gà Sao nuôi thịt. Luận văn tốt nghiệp thạc sĩ khoa học nông nghiệp, chuyên ngành chăn nuôi, Trường Đại học Cần Thơ, tr. 48 - 58.

    Van Soest, P. J., Robertson J. B. and Lewis B. A. (1991). Methods for dietary fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 74(10): 3583 - 3597