International Experience on Agricultural Byproduct Management Linked to Circular Economy Development

Date Received: 08-02-2025

Date Published: 21-02-2025

##submissions.doi##: https://doi.org/10.1234/tbqz1s82

Views

15

Downloads

12

Issue: Vol. 22 No. 11 (2024)

Section:

TỔNG QUAN

How to Cite:

Ha, V., Hien, N., Phuc, V., & Huyen, V. (2025). International Experience on Agricultural Byproduct Management Linked to Circular Economy Development. Vietnam Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 22(11). https://doi.org/10.1234/tbqz1s82

International Experience on Agricultural Byproduct Management Linked to Circular Economy Development

Vu Viet Ha , Nguyen Thi Minh Hien (*) , Vu Huy Phuc , Vu Ngoc Huyen

  • Tác giả liên hệ: ntmhien@vnua.edu.vn

    • Keywords

    Agricultural byproducts, byproduct treatment, circular agriculture economy

    Abstract


    With increasing pressure from population growth and resource consumption demands, the transition to a circular economy model in agriculture has become an urgent requirement for effective waste management and sustainable resource utilization. This study synthesized models for managing agricultural by-products from advanced countries such as China, EU, USA, Japan, and Thailand, focusing on policies and techniques aimed at optimizing the use of agricultural by-products. By analyzing literature from international sources, the research provides lessons on legal frameworks and technologies to promote the recycling and reuse of agricultural by-products in Vietnam. The findings indicate that the adoption of a circular economy not only reduces greenhouse gas emissions but also enhances the economic value of agricultural by-products, thereby improving the competitiveness of Vietnamese agricultural products. This contributes to building a sustainable agricultural sector that meets development goals and Vietnam's commitment to achieving net-zero emissions by 2050.

    References

    Agamuthu P. (2009). Challenges and opportunitities in Agro waste management: An Asian perspective. Paper presented in Inaugural Meeting of First Regional 3R Forum in Asia 11‐12 Nov 2009, Tokyo, Japan.

    Bộ NN&PTNT (2022). Báo cáo thống kê nông nghiệp. Truy cập từ https://www.mard.gov.vn/Pages/bao-cao-thong-ke.aspx# ngày 20/10/2024,

    Bùi Thị Phương Loan (2022). Báo cáo công tác bảo vệ môi trường của ngành nông nghiệp năm 2022. Viện Môi trường Nông nghiệp.

    Caudet L. & von Hammerstein-Gesmold V. (2018). A New Bioeconomy Strategy for a Sustainable Europe. European Commision Press Release; European Commision: Brussels, Belgium.

    Chen T. & Zhao Z. (2018). Benefit on emission reduction of greenhouse gas in biogas digester on scale swine farm based on clean development mechanism. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng.

    (10): 210e215.

    Chính phủ (2022a). Quyết định số 150/QĐ-TTg - Phê duyệt Chiến lược phát triển nông nghiệp và nông thôn bền vững giai đoạn 2021-2030, tầm nhìn đến năm 2050

    Chính phủ (2022b). Quyết định số 896/QĐ-TTg - Phê duyệt Chiến lược quốc gia về biến đổi khí hậu giai đoạn đến năm 2050

    Dahiya S., Kumar A.N., Shanthi Sravan J., Chatterjee S., Sarkar O. & Mohan S.V. (2018). Food waste biorefinery: sustainable strategy for circular bioeconomy. Bioresour. Technol. 248: 2-12. doi.org/10.1016/J.Biortech.2017.07.176.

    Del Borghi A., Moreschi L. & Gallo M. (2020). Circular economy approach to reduce water–energy - food nexus. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sci. Health. 13: 23-28

    Đỗ Hương (2021). Phụ phẩm nông nghiệp: nguồn tài nguyên bị lãng phí. Truy cập từ https://baochinhphu.vn/phu-pham-nong-nghiep-nguon-tai-nguyen-dang-bi-lang-phi-102300165.htm ngày 20/10/2024.

    European Parliament (2015). Circular Economy: Definition, Importance and Benefits European Parliament. Brussels, Belgium.

    European Environment Agency (2018). The Circular Economy and the Bioeconomy - Partners in Sustainability. Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg. ISBN 9789292139742.

    European Commission (2020). A New Circular Economy Action Plan for a Cleaner and More Competitive Europe. European Commission: Brussels, Belgium.

    FAO (2019). The State of Food and Agriculture, Moving Forward on Food Loss and Waste Reduction. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy.

    Fan Y. & Fang C. (2020). Circular economy development in China-current situation, evaluation and policy implications. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 84: 106441. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106441

    Gontard N., Sonesson U., Birkved M., Majone M., Bolzonella D., Celli A. & Schaer B. (2018). A research challenge vision regarding management of agricultural waste in a circular bio-based economy Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48(6): 614-654. doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2018.1471957.

    Huang Xi (2011). Models of Circular Economy on Agriculture in Yunnan Province. Energy Procedia, 5: 1078-1083. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187661021101126X?via%3Dihub on Oct 20, 2024.

    MacArthur E. (2013). Towards the circular economy. Journal of Industrial Ecology. 2: 23-44.

    Mai Lan Phương & Nguyễn Thị Minh Hiền (2024). Chính sách nông nghiệp tuần hoàn ở Việt Nam. Tạp chí Khoa học Nông nghiệp Việt Nam. 22(7).

    Nguyễn Thị Minh Hiền & Mai lan Phương (2023). Các rào cản và định hướng cho phát triển nông nghiệp tuần hoàn ở Việt Nam. Tạp chí Kinh tế & Phát triển. 318(2).

    Obi F.O., Ugwuishiwu B.O. & Nwakaire J.N. (2016). Agricultural waste concept, generation,

    utilization and management. Nigerian J. Technol. 35(4): 957-964.

    OECD (1997). Glossary of Environment Statistics, Studies in Methods, Series F, No. 67. United Nations, New York.

    OECD (2023). OECD Environmental Performance Reviews: Israel. OECD Environmental

    Performance Reviews. https://www.oecd.org/water

    Peggy Kirk Hall (2023). Open burning restrictions lift December 1, but don’t get burned by the laws. Farm Office, College of Food, Agricultural and Environmental Scicences, The Ohio State University. Retrieved from https://farmoffice.osu. edu/blog/thu-11302023-356pm/open-burning-restrictions-lift-december-1-don%E2%80%99t-get-burned-laws on Oct 20, 2024.

    Pennapa Tonrangklang, Apichit Therdyothin & Itthichai Preechawuttipong (2022). The financial feasibility of compressed biomethane gas application in Thailand. Energy, Sustainability and Society. doi.org/10.1186/s13705-022-00339-3.

    Roghanian E. & Cheraghalipour A. (2019). Addressing a set of meta-heuristics to solve a multi-objective model for closed-loop citrus supply chain considering CO2 emissions. J. Clean. Prod.

    : 118081.

    Stringer L.C. (2020). Adaptation and development pathways for different types of farmers. Environmental Science & Policy. doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.10.007.

    Tổng cục Thống kê (2023). Niên giám thống kê năm 2022. Nhà xuất bản Thống kê.

    UNEP - United Nations Environment Programme (2011). Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth, A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. Retrieved from https://sustaina bledevelopment.un.org/content/ documents/Decoupling_Report_English.pdf on Oct 20, 2024.

    United Nations (2022). Department of economic and social affairs. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/ en/desa/world-population-projected-reach-98-billion-2050-and-112-billion-2100 on Oct 20, 2024.

    Vea E.B., Romeo D. & Thomsen M. (2018). Biowaste valorisation in a future circular bioeconomy. Procedia. 69: 591-596.

    Vũ Huy Phúc (2022). Báo cáo đánh giá nhu cầu và tiềm năng thu hút đầu tư vào sử dụng nguyên liệu phế phụ phẩm nông nghiệp để phát triển kinh tế tuần hoàn trong nông nghiệp. Viện Chính sách và Chiến lược PTNNNT.

    Zhang P., Li X., Yang Y., Zheng Y. & Wang L. (2008). Greenhouse gas mitigation benefits of large and middle-scale biogas project in China. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 24(09): 239e243.